ISSUE SUMMARY
Disabilities    Ethical    History    International    Medical    Psychological    Religious    

Definitions

U.S. Historical Perspective and Current Trends

Alaska

Alaska Chronology

California

California Chronology

California Death With Dignity Act

Florida

Florida Chronology

Hawaii

Hawaii Chronology

Maine

Maine Chronology

Michigan

Kevorkian Chronology

Michigan Chronology

Proposal B - Michigan's Ballot Initiative on Assisted Suicide

New Hampshire

New Hampshire Aid-in-Dying Act

New Hampshire Chronology

New York

New York Chronology

Oregon

1st Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (1998)

2nd Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (1999)

3rd Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (2000)

4th Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (2001)

5th Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (2002)

Background of PAS in Oregon

Eighth Annual Report on Assisted Suicide in Oregon.

Executive Summary of the 5th Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (2002)

How Do Oregon Psychologists View Their Role in Physician-Assisted Suicide?

Measure 16 - Oregon Death With Dignity Act

Oregon Chronology

Oregon Physicians Attitudes About and Experiences With End-of-Life Care Since Passage of the Oregon Death With Dignity Act

Oregon's Assisted Suicide Experience: Safeguards Don't Work

Physician-Assisted Suicide: Reflections on Oregon's First Case

Suicide in the West

The Oregon Report: Don't Ask, Don't Tell

Vermont

Vermont Chronology

Washington

Initiative 119 - Washington Death With Dignity Act

Washington Chronology

Suicide in the West

By Wesley J. Smith

Wesley J. Smith, Suicide in the West, STANDARD WKLY., Apr. 20, 1998, at 12

When euthanasia enthusiasts urged Oregon voters to legalize assisted suicide, voters were assured that life termination would be conducted under the watchful eye of the state, with rigorous guidelines strictly enforced to prevent abuse. After twice being approved by voters and surviving a U.S. Supreme Court challenge, Oregon's assisted-suicide regime is now in place. The first deaths were administered in March of 1998. It is already clear that the suicide advocates deceived voters. Oregon has shrouded the suicide procedure in secrecy. The state collects statistics after the fact, when it is too late to prevent abuses. Those who favor the new law control the release of information.

Openness became the first casualty of the new law. The Oregon Health Division decreed in December of 1998 that secrecy would be the suicide bureaucracy's guiding principle. The only information that will be released publicly will be brief and nonspecific statistical data. Absolutely no information will be released about the time or place of any individual assisted suicide. The identities of those killed under the law will remain confidential. Death certificates will not list assisted suicide as a cause of death. The circumstances of individuals whose lives are ended through lethal prescriptions will not be disclosed. Bureaucrats who violate the gag order will be fired. All of this means, of course, that there will be no effective oversight and no way for the public to judge how the law works.

Posted on June 26, 2004.

© Copyright 2003 - 2006 by the Nightingale® Alliance.