Definitions U.S. Historical Perspective and Current Trends Alaska Alaska Chronology California California Chronology California Death With Dignity Act Florida Florida Chronology Hawaii Hawaii Chronology Maine Maine Chronology Michigan Kevorkian Chronology Michigan Chronology Proposal B - Michigan's Ballot Initiative on Assisted Suicide New Hampshire New Hampshire Aid-in-Dying Act New Hampshire Chronology New York New York Chronology Oregon 1st Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (1998) 2nd Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (1999) 3rd Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (2000) 4th Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (2001) 5th Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (2002) Background of PAS in Oregon Eighth Annual Report on Assisted Suicide in Oregon. Executive Summary of the 5th Annual Report on Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (2002) How Do Oregon Psychologists View Their Role in Physician-Assisted Suicide? Measure 16 - Oregon Death With Dignity Act Oregon Chronology Oregon Physicians Attitudes About and Experiences With End-of-Life Care Since Passage of the Oregon Death With Dignity Act Oregon's Assisted Suicide Experience: Safeguards Don't Work Physician-Assisted Suicide: Reflections on Oregon's First Case Suicide in the West The Oregon Report: Don't Ask, Don't Tell Vermont Vermont Chronology Washington Initiative 119 - Washington Death With Dignity Act Washington Chronology |
Initiative 119 - Washington Death With Dignity Act In November 1991, the voters in the State of Washington defeated Initiative 119, the "Death with Dignity Act". The initiative would have amended the state's Natural Death Act and would have done the following:
1) Given patients in a terminal condition the right, by means of an advance directive, to request aid-in-dying. "Aid-in-dying" was defined as "aid in the form of a medical service, that will end the life of a conscious and mentally competent, qualified patient in a dignified, painless, and humane manner, when requested voluntarily by the patient through a written directive... at the time the medical service is to be provided." The request for aid-in-dying could have been revoked by the patient at any time.
2) Expanded the definition of terminal condition to include a patient who has an incurable or an irreversible condition which would result in death within six months, or a condition in which the patient has been determined as having no reasonable probability of recovery from an irreversible coma or persistent vegetative state.
3) Added cardiac resuscitation, respiratory support, and artificially administered nutrition and hydration to the list of life-sustaining procedures that could be withheld or withdrawn by implementing a patient's advance directive.
4) Provided that no physician or health care facility was required to provide aid-in-dying, but if the request were refused, the physician or health care facility would be required to make a good faith effort to transfer the patient to another physician who would comply with the patient's wishes or to another facility. Posted on June 26, 2004. |